Dhruv Sunish vs Ishaque Eqbal Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L L L
Form
L W L W W W L W W LHead To Head: Sunish 1 - 0 Eqbal
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sunish winning 2 and Eqbal winning 1. The last match between Sunish and Eqbal was at the M15 Harare, 27-06-2019, Second, Hard with Dhruv Sunish getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dhruv Sunish | 1 |
| Ishaque Eqbal | 0 |
M15 Harare(27-06-2019)
6
4
1
6
6
3
| Sunish | Stats | Eqbal |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (13-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 877 |
| Highest Rank | 768 | |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 43% (44-59) | Career Total W/L | 56% (91-72) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Dhruv Sunish
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:4:0 | Average Match Time | 2:4:0 |
| 55% (49/89) | 1st Serve % | 63% (52/83) |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (36/52) |
| 43% (17/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 45% (37/83) | Return Points Win % | 44% (39/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dhruv Sunish Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 0-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Gates
Player
Dhruv Sunish
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-1 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Dhruv Sunish
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Dhruv Sunish
81%
(
67 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paras Dahiya
Player
Dhruv Sunish
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Bergevi
Player
Dhruv Sunish
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Dhruv Sunish
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Ishaque Eqbal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Maan Kesarwani
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
11 of
11)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Yash Yadav
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Rishi Reddy
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Rishi Reddy
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (44/59) | Win/Loss | 56% (91/72) |
| 44% (104/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (197/163) |
| 48% (1078/1163) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1770/1600) |
| 41% (24/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (74/57) |
| 47% (20/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 178 | Aces Total | 372 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 254 | Total Double Faults | 514 |
| 1:7:26 | Average Match Time | 1:26:39 |
| 406.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.29 |
| 55% (2616/4725) | 1st Serve % | 60% (5605/9359) |
| 62% (1623/2616) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3690/5605) |
| 44% (931/2109) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1783/3754) |
| 42% (204/484) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (470/987) |
| 41% (1905/4653) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3908/9163) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (42/55) | Futures W/L | 56% (91/71) |
| 42% (43/102) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (87/157) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 44% (11/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (20/38) |
| 47% (15/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 81% (43/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (90/80) |
| 19% (43/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (90/10) |
| 15% (60/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (72/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
